Date: Sun, 1 May 2011 22:59:42 -0400 From: Jason Hellenthal <jhell@DataIX.net> To: Andre Albsmeier <Andre.Albsmeier@siemens.com> Cc: "freebsd-rc@freebsd.org" <freebsd-rc@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: New knob for ignoring readonly fss in 340.noid and 310.locate? Message-ID: <20110502025942.GA31396@DataIX.net> In-Reply-To: <20110501081930.GA14448@curry.mchp.siemens.de> References: <20110430102521.GA11716@curry.mchp.siemens.de> <20110430213157.GC5660@DataIX.net> <20110501081930.GA14448@curry.mchp.siemens.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Andre, On Sun, May 01, 2011 at 10:19:30AM +0200, Andre Albsmeier wrote: >On Sat, 30-Apr-2011 at 23:31:57 +0200, Jason Hellenthal wrote: >>=20 >> By default snapshots directories are hidden and treated as a virtual > >Is it possible to hide snapshots directories in UFS? > Snapshot directories on UFS are treated differently than they are in ZFS. UFS snapshot directories live as the base of the filesystem and are not auto-mounted perse when you cd(1) into them so therefore there isn't a need to hide them because they cannot be traversed. --=20 Regards, (jhell) Jason Hellenthal --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/ Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (FreeBSD) Comment: http://bit.ly/0x89D8547E iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJNvh4eAAoJEJBXh4mJ2FR+BesH/08X4GR2G7RJT70hHwZEeelt DCI/1EuiLCfmi0lPvhnP5cMSUT7cBbPmUTvFw/essIq4JS4+r3bWpp3kUsohIm6Y vCVM9BEw0TOD50wf4mQoff0NpZ9Ip6/1v5IKLwONSfXN9rv7EBbJJO7taD4kmkJ4 brYHTXeuyf+rQPuw3y2xGBO4gEuMk3ogc5LHXvH4if1J/YeR2lxyqt38wyZAcOf1 aRPQd2oopVeTUTcT1HwORNYUZ5fT8WQPbXngkq9PXQEQ4F+6nvTiR8vGi7+rbUZ1 6Ogm+/56aBAQ6COaqhaXlQBfJn2BBO22fJBNCOUygWa9cu/VEDAZdx9pGaePyoI= =kx5I -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --pWyiEgJYm5f9v55/--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20110502025942.GA31396>