Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:35:44 +0100 From: Matthias Apitz <guru@unixarea.de> To: Armin Pirkovitsch <armin@frozen-zone.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 10-CURRENT && ports/security/p11-kit Message-ID: <20111104193543.GA1188@tiny> In-Reply-To: <4EB43AB0.4030107@frozen-zone.org> References: <20111104132640.GA1378@tiny> <4EB43AB0.4030107@frozen-zone.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
El día Friday, November 04, 2011 a las 08:19:12PM +0100, Armin Pirkovitsch escribió: > > ports/security/p11-kit (requested by ports/graphics/evince via gnome) > > does not build: > > > > Just wondering - have you looked at UPDATING? - especially: > > 20110928: > AFFECTS: users of 10-current > AUTHOR: eadler@FreeBSD.org > > There are known issues installing ports on FreeBSD 10+ due to > bogus assumptions by various build scripts. This will not be fixed > until 9-RELEASE is released. > ... I have read this and I have in /etc/make.conf the following lines: # From: "b. f." <bf1783@googlemail.com> # To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org # Date: Thu, 3 Nov 2011 13:42:50 -0400 # # No, it is not the same. You can either masquerade, by setting UNAME_r # and OSVERSION, or by editing the headers and scripts that define them; # or you can use WITH_FBSD10_FIX for ports that define HAS_CONFIGURE # (which is implied by USE_AUTOTOOLS and GNU_CONFIGURE). Right now the # masquerading is probably safer, because there are some problems with # the fix that are still being resolved -- and a few ports that may fail # despite the fix. But of course if you help to test without # masquerading, these problems will be resolved sooner. # WITH_FBSD10_FIX=1 and most of the ports I'm using are compiling now; the port mentioned here does not (not even with UNAME_r) and I wanted to bring this to the attention of the maintainer and others; HIH matthias -- Matthias Apitz e <guru@unixarea.de> - w http://www.unixarea.de/ UNIX since V7 on PDP-11, UNIX on mainframe since ESER 1055 (IBM /370) UNIX on x86 since SVR4.2 UnixWare 2.1.2, FreeBSD since 2.2.5
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20111104193543.GA1188>