Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 06:17:55 -0500 From: Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> To: FreeBSD <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Kernel Internals Documentation Message-ID: <20120104061755.4659cdf8@scorpio> In-Reply-To: <201201040016.q040GUA6013103@mail.r-bonomi.com> References: <20120103173943.5b47afc6@scorpio> <201201040016.q040GUA6013103@mail.r-bonomi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, 3 Jan 2012 18:16:30 -0600 (CST) Robert Bonomi articulated: > > Jerry <jerry@seibercom.net> wrote: > > Chad Perrin articulated: > > > > > > Now you have really peaked my interest. On any given day, on a > > > > Windows based forum, the terms: "FreePiss", open-sore", "Lsuck" > > > > etcetera are freely thrown around. On Linux based forums, terms > > > > like: "Winblows", "Microsucks", etcetera are freely used. Would > > > > you please be so kind as to explain to me why it is morally > > > > correct to use one set of terms but not the other? It is either > > > > right or it is wrong. You cannot be slightly pregnant. I > > > > personally find such terms morally repugnant; however, since > > > > they are commonly used on this forum it appears that they are > > > > socially acceptable. Would you not concur or are you going to > > > > try and bullshit your way out of this one? > > > > > > 1. I didn't say it was "morally correct" to use one set of > > > derogatory forms and "morally incorrect" to use the other. You > > > are attributing arguments to me I never made. > > > > I just spent a half hour rereading every post on this thread to see > > if I had inadvertently stated that you had stated in any way that > > it was "morally correct". Guess what, there aren't any such > > statements. snip] > He did *NOT* ask the prior poster to explain "why it _would_be_ > morally correct..." HE demanded that they explain "why it *IS* > morally correct..." <quote> Would you please be so kind as to explain to me why ..." </quote> You consider that a demand? That is the most incredible statement I read in this entire thread. If I had demanded an answer, I would have clearly indicated it. I am not bashful, as you may have noticed. I simple asked him to explain why such behavior would be morally acceptable. At that point he made the accusation that I had attributed such statements, directly or indirectly to him. I neither did, nor is there any evidence to support the claim that I had. Both of you choose to conveniently sidestep that simple fact. Although to his credit, he did explain his feelings on the matter. Now, if I asked you to explain the moral justification for the Thirteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution, would I be accusing you of actually having written it? You don't think things through do you?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120104061755.4659cdf8>