Date: Wed, 4 Jan 2012 23:29:55 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: Garrett Cooper <yanegomi@gmail.com> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: add 'ldd' to cross-tools ? Message-ID: <20120104222955.GA73868@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <CAGH67wR0jwr9vtJWNCB=-947TSAxciEf971m4keNNkwxvO9SeQ@mail.gmail.com> References: <20120104222315.GA73613@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> <CAGH67wR0jwr9vtJWNCB=-947TSAxciEf971m4keNNkwxvO9SeQ@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 02:10:36PM -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 4, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> wrote:
> > Hi,
> > in doing cross-builds of picobsd, i found i need a cross-version
> > of "ldd" so i can run it on the host to detect which shared libraries
> > are used by binaries on the target architecture
> > (for amd64->i386 there is a partial workaround, but don't know
> > if it works in other cases)
> >
> > Is there any concern in adding usr.bin/ldd to the list of cross-tools
> > in Makefile.inc1 ? It is a small program and should not increase
> > the build time in any significant way.
> >
> > Otherwise, does anyone know the magic to build a cross-arch
> > version of a program in the FreeBSD source tree ?
>
> objdump IMO is a lot easier to parse and it's already built via cross-tools:
>
> $ objdump -x `which tar` | awk '$1 == "NEEDED" { print $2 }'
> libarchive.so.5
> libbz2.so.4
> libz.so.6
> liblzma.so.5
> libbsdxml.so.4
> libcrypto.so.6
> libc.so.7
wonderful, thanks!
cheers
luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120104222955.GA73868>