Date: Mon, 04 Jun 2012 01:41:31 -0700 From: Dave Hayes <dave@jetcafe.org> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD ? Message-ID: <201206040841.q548fVHa091169@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> In-Reply-To: <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com> References: <CAOgwaMvsv3e1TxDauV038Pp7LRiYeH7oAODE%2Bw-pxHt9oGrXMA@mail.gmail.com> <201206020012.q520CEcf057568@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120602004230.GA14487@in-addr.com> <201206040224.q542OBqk085897@hugeraid.jetcafe.org> <20120604043233.GB32597@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> writes: > On Sun, Jun 03, 2012 at 07:24:11PM -0700, Dave Hayes wrote: >> I see features and pkgng and things being offered up as solutions... >> these are all well and good, but in my opinion more comprehensive >> documentation and support in these areas would do more good than pkgng. > IMHO pkgng and optionsng are necessary, but not sufficient, to solve > our current problems. Optionsng is nice, but lacking in documentation. Is it too much to ask port maintainers to write a bit more documentation on the options they are providing? -- Dave Hayes - Consultant - Altadena CA, USA - dave@jetcafe.org >>> The opinions expressed above are entirely my own <<< Sunshine proves it's own existence.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206040841.q548fVHa091169>