Date: Fri, 15 Jun 2012 07:49:49 -0500 (CDT) From: Robert Bonomi <bonomi@mail.r-bonomi.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Uptime [OT] Message-ID: <201206151249.q5FCnnKF019002@mail.r-bonomi.com> In-Reply-To: <op.wfxecjm234t2sn@cr48.lan>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Thu Jun 14 22:56:16 2012 > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2012 22:51:45 -0500 > From: Mark Felder <feld@feld.me> > Cc: Steve Bertrand <steve.bertrand@gmail.com> > Subject: Re: Uptime [OT] > > FreeBSD REDACTED 6.0-RELEASE FreeBSD 6.0-RELEASE #0: Wed Nov 15 16:29:10 > CST 2006 root@REDACTED:/usr/src/sys/i386/compile/IPFW-POLING-ALTQ i386 > > Theres no way I'm giving out the organization name or hostname haha. We're > slowly moving customers away from this device, but not forcing anyone. > > I wonder if the technician who compiled that kernel considered how long it > would run.... Heh. check out -this- one: % uname -a ****** ******************** *** **** ****** *** Kernel #0: Thu Mar 20 16:40:01 CST 1997 ************************:/usr/src/sys/compile/LOCAL i386 The build date _is_ accurate, the hardware it's running on is old enough to vote. <wry grin> It's publicly accessible on the Internet, It's not quite as ridiculous as it looks, the (limited) apps running on it _are_ up-to-date. Uptime is nothing to brag about -- no UPS, combined with 'unreliable' public utility power, does have an impact.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201206151249.q5FCnnKF019002>