Date: Thu, 6 Sep 2012 11:19:22 -0700 From: Arthur Mesh <arthurmesh@gmail.com> To: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no> Cc: freebsd-security@freebsd.org, RW <rwmaillists@googlemail.com> Subject: Re: svn commit: r239569 - head/etc/rc.d Message-ID: <20120906181922.GA89120@x96.org> In-Reply-To: <86392vqc86.fsf@ds4.des.no> References: <201208221843.q7MIhLU4077951@svn.freebsd.org> <5043DBAF.40506@FreeBSD.org> <20120903005708.7082f230@gumby.homeunix.com> <20120906171824.GC14757@dragon.NUXI.org> <86392vqc86.fsf@ds4.des.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 06, 2012 at 07:42:49PM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav wrote: > Is there a reason to choose sha256 over a weaker, faster hash? Given the fact that yarrow uses sha256 internally, I don't think it's a sound idea to add weaker links to the chain.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20120906181922.GA89120>