Date: Thu, 27 Dec 2012 20:22:50 -0600 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org, CeDeROM <cederom@tlen.pl> Subject: Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements Message-ID: <20121228022250.GA9064@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <20121226170233.GA1408@faust.sbb.rs> References: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs> <CAFYkXjk8LgrYAm6iTtiAkrHKWcGDFij-7H9j1dgj305KemaOhw@mail.gmail.com> <20121226170233.GA1408@faust.sbb.rs>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Dec 26, 2012 at 06:02:33PM +0100, Zoran Kolic wrote: > > Seeing 9.1-RELEASE instead 9.1-PRERELASE > > or 9.1-RC4 is also a bad suprise for me... > > I assume it does not look like release is the lack > of packages. What you are seeing is behind-the-scenes preparation. The release is official when, and only when, a security-signed email is sent to freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.org from the Release Engineering team. mcl
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121228022250.GA9064>