Date: Fri, 28 Dec 2012 16:19:00 +0100 From: Zoran Kolic <zkolic@sbb.rs> To: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 9.1 minimal ram requirements Message-ID: <20121228151900.GA1327@faust.sbb.rs> In-Reply-To: <20121228022250.GA9064@lonesome.com> References: <20121225151532.GA1404@faust.sbb.rs> <CAFYkXjk8LgrYAm6iTtiAkrHKWcGDFij-7H9j1dgj305KemaOhw@mail.gmail.com> <20121226170233.GA1408@faust.sbb.rs> <20121228022250.GA9064@lonesome.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> What you are seeing is behind-the-scenes preparation.
> The release is official when, and only when, a security-signed email is
> sent to freebsd-announce@FreeBSD.org from the Release Engineering team.
Yeah, Mark. You're right.
Further, I'm right too. What should I install on blank
node? Beta? No beta on the site. RC1-3? No RC on the
site. 9.0? I need kms at least on laptop. My simple
question is: what is the file on the server? Please,
no only-when, no wait-for-... I'm might be ignorant in
many ways, but I expect freebsd site to content what
it reads as a file name.
So, do I have installed 9.1 on my desktop and laptop
or some alien OS? Do I have to wait more and reinstall
from the beginning, when official announcement comes?
To be clear: freebsd is my only OS on computer for many
years and I do not argue in any way. I just want to
say that silence is not a good kind of communication.
Best regards
Zoran
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20121228151900.GA1327>