Date: Tue, 15 Jan 2013 15:51:03 +0900 From: YongHyeon PYUN <pyunyh@gmail.com> To: Ruslan Makhmatkhanov <cvs-src@yandex.ru> Cc: Jeremie Le Hen <jlh@freebsd.org>, freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: if_vr(4) and DFE520-TX Message-ID: <20130115065103.GC1434@michelle.cdnetworks.com> In-Reply-To: <50F4FB8A.6090100@yandex.ru> References: <50F110AB.1030107@yandex.ru> <50F14880.4090001@yandex.ru> <50F177E9.3040003@yandex.ru> <20130114061553.GA3531@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F3F172.5060903@yandex.ru> <20130115024430.GA3152@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F4F7E6.7070004@yandex.ru> <20130115064011.GA1434@michelle.cdnetworks.com> <50F4FB8A.6090100@yandex.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:47:38AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 10:40: > >On Tue, Jan 15, 2013 at 10:32:06AM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 15.01.2013 06:44: > >>>On Mon, Jan 14, 2013 at 03:52:18PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>>>YongHyeon PYUN wrote on 14.01.2013 10:15: > >>>>>On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 06:49:13PM +0400, Ruslan Makhmatkhanov wrote: > >>>>>>Ok, I got some details. It's an DFE-520TX (/C1 or rev. C1). I crafted > >>>>>>an > >>>>>>patch attached, but whenever kldloading the modified if_vr, I got > >>>>>>this: > >>>> > >>>>[...] > >>>> > >>>>>>I also tried to apply VR_Q_NEEDALIGN quirk, but nothing is changed. > >>>>>>Any > >>>>>>hints? > >>>>> > >>>>>I recall D-Link was one of notorious vendor which used to > >>>>>completely change its chip set in later revisions without notice. So > >>>>>I'm afraid the controller you have may not be a VIA manufactured > >>>>>one. > >>>>>Could you take a picture of the chip set of controller and let > >>>>>others see it? I guess it could be a RealTek 8139 or 8139C+. > >>>> > >>>>Here they are. Both front and back for the case (see no traces of > >>>>RealTek though): > >>>> > >>>>http://s2.postimage.org/9nvkrlpqx/IMAG1040.jpg > >>>>http://s2.postimage.org/4qi06hnrt/IMAG1041.jpg > >>> > >>>Thanks. Try attached patch and let me know how it works. > >>>If that patch does not work, try setting a loader tunable like the > >>>following. > >>>dev.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 > >> > >>Terrific! It's now attaching fine, but network over it doesn't seems > >>working (can't ping/access machine via this interface): > > > >Please use my patch. I think rl(4) is the right driver for your > >controller. Jeremie's patch forces re(4) to attach. > > To be honest, your and Jeremie patches are identical. Your patch is > against if_re/if_rlreg.h too :) Hmm, I don't get it. Diff inlined again. Index: sys/pci/if_rlreg.h =================================================================== --- sys/pci/if_rlreg.h (revision 245199) +++ sys/pci/if_rlreg.h (working copy) @@ -1048,6 +1048,11 @@ struct rl_softc { #define DLINK_DEVICEID_530TXPLUS 0x1300 /* + * D-Link DFE-520TX rev. C1 device ID + */ +#define DLINK_DEVICEID_520TX_REVC1 0x4200 + +/* * D-Link DFE-5280T device ID */ #define DLINK_DEVICEID_528T 0x4300 Index: sys/pci/if_rl.c =================================================================== --- sys/pci/if_rl.c (revision 245199) +++ sys/pci/if_rl.c (working copy) @@ -148,6 +148,8 @@ static const struct rl_type rl_devs[] = { "Delta Electronics 8139 10/100BaseTX" }, { ADDTRON_VENDORID, ADDTRON_DEVICEID_8139, RL_8139, "Addtron Technology 8139 10/100BaseTX" }, + { DLINK_VENDORID, DLINK_DEVICEID_520TX_REVC1, RL_8139, + "D-Link DFE-520TX (rev. C1) 10/100BaseTX" }, { DLINK_VENDORID, DLINK_DEVICEID_530TXPLUS, RL_8139, "D-Link DFE-530TX+ 10/100BaseTX" }, { DLINK_VENDORID, DLINK_DEVICEID_690TXD, RL_8139, > > >>re0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu > >>1500 > >>options=8209b<RXCSUM,TXCSUM,VLAN_MTU,VLAN_HWTAGGING,VLAN_HWCSUM,WOL_MAGIC,LINKSTATE> > >> ether 90:94:e4:82:d5:e6 > >> inet 192.168.0.208 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 192.168.0.255 > >> inet6 fe80::9294:e4ff:fe82:d5e6%re0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x5 > >> nd6 options=29<PERFORMNUD,IFDISABLED,AUTO_LINKLOCAL> > >> media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > >> status: active > >> > >>re0@pci0:4:1:0: class=0x020000 card=0x11031186 chip=0x42001186 > >>rev=0x10 hdr=0x00 > >> vendor = 'D-Link System Inc' > >> class = network > >> subclass = ethernet > >> > >>I also tried to add dev.rl.0.prefer_iomap=0 to /boot/loader.conf with no > >>difference. I'll try to experiment with this later this day when there > >>will be no active users on this machine, then let you know the results. > > > >It's not a valid option when you use re(4). > > > >>Thank you! > > Yes, it was unmindful copy/paste, sorry. > > -- > Regards, > Ruslan > > Tinderboxing kills... the drives.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130115065103.GC1434>