Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 2 May 2013 17:18:57 -0500
From:      Graham Allan <allan@physics.umn.edu>
To:        "Marc G. Fournier" <scrappy@hub.org>
Cc:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: NFS Performance issue against NetApp
Message-ID:  <20130502221857.GJ32659@physics.umn.edu>
In-Reply-To: <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org>
References:  <834305228.13772274.1367527941142.JavaMail.root@k-state.edu> <75CB6F1E-385D-4E51-876E-7BB8D7140263@hub.org>

index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail

On Thu, May 02, 2013 at 02:05:38PM -0700, Marc G. Fournier wrote:
> 
> The thing is, I'm not convinced it is a NFS related issue … there are *so* many other variables involved … it could be something with the network stack … it could be something with the scheduler … it could be … hell, it could be like the guy states in that blog posting (http://antibsd.wordpress.com/) and be the compiler changes … 

I'm just watching interestedly from the sidelines, and I hesitate to ask
because it seems too obvious - maybe I missed something - but have you
run both tests (Linux and FreeBSD) purely with local disk, to get a
baseline independent of NFS?

Graham


help

Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20130502221857.GJ32659>