Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:53:22 -0400 From: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> To: freebsd-acpi@freebsd.org Cc: Laura Marie Feeney <lmfeeney@sics.se>, Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@freebsd.org>, "Sergey A. Osokin" <osa@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: suspend/resume on Lenovo X1 (regression from reports on wiki) Message-ID: <201308301153.23184.jhb@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <20130830145102.GG32399@FreeBSD.org> References: <521D03AE.3050709@sics.se> <CAJ-VmokcQOhAE6y_=J1uzPHneSF%2BjYSpdo%2Bwdf7Gd0h36pRHwQ@mail.gmail.com> <20130830145102.GG32399@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Friday, August 30, 2013 10:51:02 am Sergey A. Osokin wrote: > On Fri, Aug 30, 2013 at 01:39:59AM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > > On 29 August 2013 20:14, Sergey A. Osokin <osa@freebsd.org> wrote: > > > On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 07:03:10PM +0400, Gleb Smirnoff wrote: > > > > Laura, > > > > > > > > Now bad news :) Last major Xorg update in ports, which happened couple > > > > of months ago, introduced a regression: xorg performs very slowly after > > > > resume. If the server process is restarted, then a new one performs okay. > > > > > > Agree with Gleb. Kind of a slowness exist after resume. > > > > > Can y'all grab some basic, naive benchmarks (disk, CPU) and compare them > > before/after a suspend/resume cycle? > > Unfortunately, I'm not sure what I need to check... Maybe try x11perf before and after? I just removed VESA from my kernel on an X220 and it now suspends and resumes great in X. I don't notice any slowdown, but I'm using a very simple tiling window manager (i3wm). -- John Baldwin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201308301153.23184.jhb>