Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2013 14:46:20 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: Warren Block <wblock@wonkity.com> Cc: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: What are the limits for FFS file systems? 10+ years out of date.. Message-ID: <20131124224620.GR7069@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311240716560.85786@wonkity.com> References: <20131124061218.GQ7069@funkthat.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1311240716560.85786@wonkity.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Warren Block wrote this message on Sun, Nov 24, 2013 at 07:21 -0700:
> On Sat, 23 Nov 2013, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
>
> >Attached is a patch that bring this up to date.. This was written back
> >when we were using UFS1 w/ 32bit block addresses... Things have changes
> >now that UFS2 is standard...
> >
> >The big thing is listing the memory requirements for fsck as the main
> >limiting factor on FS size...
> >
> >I've had Kirk review the patch, and he's fine w/ it...
> >
> >Shall I just commit it?
>
> fsck should be either &man.fsck.8; or <command>fsck</command>, depending
> on context.
>
> There is a duplicated "the" in the first paragraph. igor -Rz should be
> run on the patched file.
This is a single reply, thanks to the three of you for reviewing the
patch.. it's now committed in r43236..
Oh, I did change a such as to e.g., and in doing so, I noticed an e.g.
w/o the trailing period... wondering if we should be consistent and
add it?
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131124224620.GR7069>