Date: Thu, 5 Dec 2013 19:38:15 +0100 From: Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: BIND chroot environment in 10-RELEASE...gone? Message-ID: <20131205193815.05de3829de9e33197fe210ac@getmail.no> In-Reply-To: <E915D8A5-1CD0-465B-BAD1-59C45C9415F4@gid.co.uk> References: <529D9CC5.8060709@rancid.berkeley.edu> <20131204095855.GY29825@droso.dk> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1312041212000.2022@badger.tharned.org> <E915D8A5-1CD0-465B-BAD1-59C45C9415F4@gid.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 19:59:03 +0000 Bob Bishop <rb@gid.co.uk> wrote: > Hi, > > On 4 Dec 2013, at 18:49, Greg Rivers <gcr+freebsd-stable@tharned.org> wrote: > > > ... It's not a matter of BIND being more or less secure than other software, it's a matter of POLA and the huge duplicated efforts required by everyone going forward to either maintain > > their own chroot or migrate to the non-chroot installation. ... > > Exactly. This is going to be a PITA. I just hope for two things: 1) that creating POLA violations is not a general policy for FreeBSD going forward 2) that this mess around FreeBSD 10 will not slow the adoption rate of FreeBSD 10. -- Torfinn Ingolfsen <torfinn.ingolfsen@getmail.no>
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20131205193815.05de3829de9e33197fe210ac>