Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2014 19:58:32 +0100 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it> To: wishmaster <artemrts@ukr.net> Cc: "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" <net@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: netmap, VALE and netmap pipes Message-ID: <20140217185832.GB41267@onelab2.iet.unipi.it> In-Reply-To: <1392661063.244494415.kh0fdlsv@frv34.fwdcdn.com> References: <CA%2BhQ2%2Bgbs9aBneUaDGAnKVoPHspzc=5o%2Bh%2Bf_K=T%2BCy8sRxr%2Bw@mail.gmail.com> <1392661063.244494415.kh0fdlsv@frv34.fwdcdn.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Feb 17, 2014 at 08:36:06PM +0200, wishmaster wrote: > > Thanks, prof. Luigi. > > As for me, netmap-ipfw is especially interesting. Would you like add some examples for userspace bundle of ipfw and dummynet. Because not all clear in README-file. > > E.g. I have classic router with 2 interfaces igb replace the "vale" ports with "netmap:igb0" and "netmap"igb1" and off you go. make sure you have some way to access the router because at the moment igb0 and igb1 will be disconnected from the host stack (this can be changed but at the moment this is what it does). cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140217185832.GB41267>