Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2014 23:59:02 +0100 From: Kai Wang <kaiw@FreeBSD.org> To: Mark Johnston <markj@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-stable stable <freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.org>, Dimitry Andric <dim@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: merged llvm/clang 3.4 Message-ID: <20140328225902.GA7417@soulhacker> In-Reply-To: <CAMw1wOxgwC47sj_rDvzys7_xb8%2BYRz=kdMq9dj=Z=WchypmU5Q@mail.gmail.com> References: <0E7E81A1-54E9-4920-A360-005A1C0C4D47@FreeBSD.org> <20140327002240.GC49672@raichu> <C0345D09-CC49-49F6-ACCA-B85C7882AAC3@FreeBSD.org> <CAMw1wOxgwC47sj_rDvzys7_xb8%2BYRz=kdMq9dj=Z=WchypmU5Q@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 11:03:11PM -0400, Mark Johnston wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 27, 2014 at 6:32 PM, Dimitry Andric <dim@freebsd.org> wrote:
> > On 27 Mar 2014, at 01:22, Mark Johnston <markj@freebsd.org> wrote:
> >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2014 at 07:17:22PM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> >>> Hi,
> >>>
> >>> I have just merged llvm and clang 3.4 release to stable/10 (r263508) and
> >>> stable/9 (r263509). This already includes a number of post-3.4 fixes,
> >>> though there are a few that are still awaiting the MFC timeout (e.g. the
> >>> updated Sparc64 backend, and some things that were just fixed the day
> >>> before yesterday).
> >>>
> >>> Since the most obvious problems have already been addressed in head, I
> >>> expect this to be a fairly smooth upgrade. If you run into something
> >>> strange anyway, please reply to this message (CC'ing the list).
> >>>
> >>> -Dimitry
> >>>
> >>
> >> Hello,
> >>
> >> DTrace seems to no longer work properly on stable/10; I get errors like
> >> the following
> >>
> >> dtrace: invalid probe specifier pid$target::malloc:entry{ }:
> >> "/usr/lib/dtrace/io.d", line 49: cannot find type: struct devstat*: Type
> >> information is in parent and unavailable
> >>
> >> and I know of a couple other users running into the same problem.
> >>
> >> I recall that some changes to libdwarf, libelf and the CTF tools were needed
> >> in order to work with clang 3.4; do you know if there's any plan to MFC them
> >> soon as well?
> >
> > I have taken a look, but libdwarf and libelf were reorganized quite a
> > bit, and it would require library bumps, which are difficult (but
> > apparently not unheard of) for stable branches. I am also not sure if
> > the actual workarounds can be successfully ported back to the versions
> > of libdwarf, libelf and CTF in stable/10 and stable/9.
>
> Is there any reason that the newer libdwarf and libelf couldn't
> coexist alongside libdwarf and libelf in stable/9 and 10? That is,
> install them to /usr/lib/private or so and have the CTF tools link
> against them instead of the system libraries.
Hi,
I extracted a patch for ctfconvert from -head and adapted it to the
old libdwarf in stable/10. The patch fixes some type parsing bugs for
ctfconvert with Clang 3.4 objects, which might be related to your
DTrace issue, but I'm not sure...
The patch is here:
http://people.freebsd.org/~kaiw/ctfconvert-stable10.patch
(It should apply to stable/10. Both world and kernel needs recompile)
Thanks,
Kai
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20140328225902.GA7417>