Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2015 18:09:16 +0000 From: Andrew Turner <andrew@fubar.geek.nz> To: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org Subject: Re: interrupt framework Message-ID: <20150121180916.110fc8ad@bender.lan> In-Reply-To: <FB774FC2-CDF0-4E3F-95B8-59755EA54CCC@bsdimp.com> References: <CAFHCsPX5kG_v-F-cjpyMQsT_b386eok=mqWW0%2BEUb_4-_1Otnw@mail.gmail.com> <54BA9888.1020303@freebsd.org> <CAFHCsPX-X-OG4jGLbhdH1BVtqorJKUeaVbzabX-%2BUfEM2fhD6A@mail.gmail.com> <54BD3F86.3010901@freebsd.org> <CAFHCsPUqq-o4z9c5_8SYxcefUiFvGADB5FnB5NiQuu6XBrdyng@mail.gmail.com> <54BD9794.4080204@freebsd.org> <CAFHCsPXLvwJ_5FJaeoKSHjbgmtwzSXFtuPr1h=bO1g9tghyDog@mail.gmail.com> <54BE7E6D.6060800@freebsd.org> <FB774FC2-CDF0-4E3F-95B8-59755EA54CCC@bsdimp.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 10:50:14 -0700 Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> wrote: > “usually”? I thought it was always 100%: We’re wither using FDT or > we’re not. Some platforms allow compiling for both (mostly as a > transition aid to FDT), but I’m not aware of any that would be a mix. There may be a case on arm64 to use both fdt and ACPI. In this case it would be used as a transition to add support for ACPI as some hardware may require it. Andrewhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150121180916.110fc8ad>