Date: Mon, 2 Feb 2015 16:33:07 -0800 From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg@funkthat.com> To: Erich Dollansky <erichsfreebsdlist@alogt.com> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: top, fixed buffer length in utils.c Message-ID: <20150203003307.GG27103@funkthat.com> In-Reply-To: <20150201175159.7fa88d16@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com> References: <20150201175159.7fa88d16@B85M-HD3-0.alogt.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Erich Dollansky wrote this message on Sun, Feb 01, 2015 at 17:51 +0800:
> int can be 64 bits on a amd64 machine. Why is the author of this code
> so sure that we will never cross the 32 bit boundary?
Per others, int is currently 32bits on all platforms we support...
I guess adding:
CTASSERT(sizeof(int) <= 4);
would help fix your concern? at least now the expectation is codified
and if it breaks, the build will break..
--
John-Mark Gurney Voice: +1 415 225 5579
"All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20150203003307.GG27103>