Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2015 16:50:50 +0100
From: Jamie Landeg-Jones <jamie@dyslexicfish.net>
To: rkoberman@gmail.com, jamie@dyslexicfish.net, delphij@delphij.net
Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, d@delphij.net
Subject: Re: Proposal: make portsnap generate INDEX-${OSREL:R} only by default
Message-ID: <201508071550.t77Fopdf076128@dyslexicfish.net>
In-Reply-To: <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net>
References: <55C3F9AA.4020602@delphij.net> <CAN6yY1u6PHDFpTPohT7KQ6O4_TQUpAmJfEjOdXaL12Oy8MRQKg@mail.gmail.com> <201508070458.t774wiqp073664@dyslexicfish.net> <CAN6yY1vg51O63gVPG%2BX_Ev92Ch_Ld%2BJQokWECYsBHQts3TTbfA@mail.gmail.com> <55C44605.1040004@delphij.net>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
Xin Li <delphij@delphij.net> wrote: > On 8/6/15 22:24, Kevin Oberman wrote: > > Or the code in portsnap could be modified to get the current > > running version. > > I thought about this today but it won't work as advertised: someone > (currently me) still have to tweak the portsnap builder configuration > to announce new major version (9, 10, 11 now, and we would need 12 > when 11.0-STABLE appears). However, freebsd-update or mergemaster > would take care for this. I was going to suggest this too. Isn't this information available using /bin/freebsd-version -u ? Yes, I realise this script basically has it hardcoded, but it seems, therefore, that someone already has the task to announce new major version in that file! Cheers! Jamiehome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201508071550.t77Fopdf076128>