Date: Mon, 8 Feb 2016 20:39:35 +0300 From: Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> To: Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> Cc: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@iet.unipi.it>, "stable@freebsd.org" <stable@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: 82576 + NETMAP + VLAN Message-ID: <20160208173935.GK68298@zxy.spb.ru> In-Reply-To: <CAJ-VmomzvoZZZPUveTZUJ5zAhHQkJ5M9%2B7gfN8gGSGp05JpOWw@mail.gmail.com> References: <CAJ-VmonO8ok=twgBGVMBiAs=AyRs4LUoDX6pGBtWStvndGKGzg@mail.gmail.com> <20151018210049.GT6469@zxy.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmonfxz5vjVHqp6gS97mhnU10SLgohRA35O8MQLUzHvcsrw@mail.gmail.com> <20151022163519.GF6469@zxy.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmok56uBJgJh4Bwr7yjNwsigU=ySBJ08H26caODAAxXNLRA@mail.gmail.com> <CA%2BhQ2%2Bg0ggpS%2BE5nOpON66efs7cwsed=NvaKa=mzsg6FycGhiQ@mail.gmail.com> <20160202204446.GQ88527@zxy.spb.ru> <20160204130029.GC88527@zxy.spb.ru> <CAJ-Vmok%2B7Vt4ww4iWkQY505eapxVQF4MBtnb%2BwGg-TNSmJTLGw@mail.gmail.com> <CAJ-VmomzvoZZZPUveTZUJ5zAhHQkJ5M9%2B7gfN8gGSGp05JpOWw@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 10:47:34AM -0800, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. but if it does, can you enable witness and see what it reports as > lock order violations? last STABLE: 1. first LOR (with poll, don't cause direct problems now): lock order reversal: 1st 0xfffff800946e6700 vm object (vm object) @ /usr/src/sys/vm/vm_fault.c:363 2nd 0xffffffff813e14d8 netmap memory allocator lock (netmap memory allocator lock) @ /usr/src/sys/dev/netmap/netmap_mem2.c:393 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80970320 at kdb_backtrace+0x60 #1 0xffffffff809882ce at witness_checkorder+0xc7e #2 0xffffffff8091fcbc at __mtx_lock_flags+0x4c #3 0xffffffff806784f6 at netmap_mem_ofstophys+0x36 #4 0xffffffff80676834 at netmap_dev_pager_fault+0x34 #5 0xffffffff80b81a0f at dev_pager_getpages+0x3f #6 0xffffffff80b8cc1e at vm_fault_hold+0x86e #7 0xffffffff80b8c367 at vm_fault+0x77 #8 0xffffffff80d0e2c9 at trap_pfault+0x199 #9 0xffffffff80d0db47 at trap+0x527 #10 0xffffffff80cf4ce2 at calltrap+0x8 2. kqueue issuse (not LOR!) acquiring duplicate lock of same type: "nm_kn_lock" 1st nm_kn_lock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:2003 2nd nm_kn_lock @ /usr/src/sys/kern/kern_event.c:2003 KDB: stack backtrace: #0 0xffffffff80970320 at kdb_backtrace+0x60 #1 0xffffffff809882ce at witness_checkorder+0xc7e #2 0xffffffff8091fcbc at __mtx_lock_flags+0x4c #3 0xffffffff808fd899 at knote+0x39 #4 0xffffffff8067636b at freebsd_selwakeup+0x8b #5 0xffffffff80674eb5 at netmap_notify+0x55 #6 0xffffffff8067ccb6 at netmap_pipe_txsync+0x156 #7 0xffffffff80674740 at netmap_poll+0x400 #8 0xffffffff80676b8e at netmap_knrw+0x6e #9 0xffffffff808fc57a at kqueue_register+0x64a #10 0xffffffff808fcdd4 at kern_kevent_fp+0x144 #11 0xffffffff808fcc4f at kern_kevent+0x9f #12 0xffffffff808fcaea at sys_kevent+0x12a #13 0xffffffff80d0e914 at amd64_syscall+0x2d4 #14 0xffffffff80cf4fcb at Xfast_syscall+0xfb Do you need anything? > On 4 February 2016 at 10:47, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > > I've no time to help with this, I'm sorry :( > > > > > > -a > > > > > > On 4 February 2016 at 05:00, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > >> On Tue, Feb 02, 2016 at 11:44:47PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote: > >> > >>> On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:24:53AM -0700, Luigi Rizzo wrote: > >>> > >>> > On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Adrian Chadd <adrian.chadd@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> > > On 22 October 2015 at 09:35, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> wrote: > >>> > >> On Sun, Oct 18, 2015 at 07:45:52PM -0700, Adrian Chadd wrote: > >>> > >> > >>> > >>> Heh, file a bug with luigi; it should be defined better inside netmap itself. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> I am CC: luigi. > >>> > >> > >>> > >> Next question: do kevent RX/TX sync? > >>> > >> In my setup I am need to manual NIOCTXSYNC/NIOCRXSYNC. > >>> > > > >>> > > Hi, > >>> > > > >>> > > Nope. kqueue() doesn't do the implicit sync like poll() does; it's > >>> > > just the notification path. > >>> > > >>> > actually not. When the file descriptor is registered there > >>> > is an implicit sync, and there is another one when an event > >>> > is posted for the file descriptor. > >>> > > >>> > unless there are bugs, of course. > >>> > >>> I found strange behaivor: > >>> > >>> 1. open netmap and register in main thread > >>> 2. kevent register in different thread > >>> 3. result: got event by kevent but no ring sinc (all head,tail,cur > >>> still 0). > >>> > >>> Is this normal? Or is this bug? > >>> > >>> open and registering netmap in same thread as kevent resolve this. > >> > >> Also, kevent+netmap deadlocked for me: > >> > >> PID TID COMM TDNAME KSTACK > >> 1095 100207 addos - mi_switch+0xe1 sleepq_catch_signals+0xab sleepq_timedwait_sig+0x10 _sleep+0x238 kern_nanosleep+0x10e sys_nanosleep+0x51 amd64_syscall+0x40f Xfast_syscall+0xfb > >> 1095 100208 addos worker#0 mi_switch+0xe1 sleepq_catch_signals+0xab sleepq_wait_sig+0xf _sleep+0x27d kern_kevent+0x401 sys_kevent+0x12a amd64_syscall+0x40f Xfast_syscall+0xfb > >> 1095 100209 addos worker#1 mi_switch+0xe1 turnstile_wait+0x42a __mtx_lock_sleep+0x26b knote+0x38 freebsd_selwakeup+0x8b netmap_notify+0x55 netmap_pipe_txsync+0x156 netmap_poll+0x400 netmap_knrw+0x6e kqueue_register+0x799 kern_kevent+0x158 sys_kevent+0x12a amd64_syscall+0x40f Xfast_syscall+0xfb > >> 1095 100210 addos worker#2 mi_switch+0xe1 sleepq_catch_signals+0xab sleepq_wait_sig+0xf _sleep+0x27d kern_kevent+0x401 sys_kevent+0x12a amd64_syscall+0x40f Xfast_syscall+0xfb > >> 1095 100211 addos worker#NOIP mi_switch+0xe1 sleepq_catch_signals+0xab sleepq_wait_sig+0xf _sleep+0x27d kern_kevent+0x401 sys_kevent+0x12a amd64_syscall+0x40f Xfast_syscall+0xfb > >> 1095 100212 addos balancer mi_switch+0xe1 turnstile_wait+0x42a __mtx_lock_sleep+0x26b knote+0x38 freebsd_selwakeup+0x8b netmap_notify+0x2a netmap_pipe_rxsync+0x54 netmap_poll+0x774 netmap_knrw+0x6e kern_kevent+0x5cc sys_kevent+0x12a amd64_syscall+0x40f Xfast_syscall+0xfb
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20160208173935.GK68298>