Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2016 00:32:17 -0500 From: Mike Karels <mike@karels.net> To: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org> Cc: George Neville-Neil <gnn@freebsd.org>, net@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: TCP route caching panic Message-ID: <201610200532.u9K5WHH8018605@mail.karels.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of Wed, 19 Oct 2016 19:21:07 -0700. <20161020022107.GO27748@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 07:26:44PM -0500, Mike Karels wrote:
> M> > On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 02:29:14PM -0700, Gleb Smirnoff wrote:
> M> > T> Hi!
> M> > T>
> M> > T> I got this panic in a bhyve VM, which was just compiling stuff
> M> > T> and had two ssh sessions open. It has static network configuration,
> M> > T> one interfaces, one IP address, IPv4 only and it sees only hardware
> M> > T> address of the host. So it is minimal possible configuration. It
> M> > T> runs with INVARIANTS.
> M>
> M> > Important note that kernel has FLOWTABLE option. And recently I refined
> M> > the original fix of FLOWTABLE+inpcb_route_cache. This might be related,
> M> > but I don't see how. The inp code explicitly nulls the ro_lle when
> M> > it frees it.
> M>
> M> Hmm, I run a similar configuration, but may not run as many compiles.
> M> I'm running a recent head GENERIC system, so has INVARIANTS. I've
> M> tested with FLOWTABLE in the past; I'll try it again now.
> M>
> M> But if I understand correctly, you have modifications? Could we see
> M> them (assuming they are not in the tree, I haven't been watching closely)?
> No, I don't have modifications.
Sorry then, what did you mean by this:
And recently I refined the original fix of FLOWTABLE+inpcb_route_cache.
This might be related,
I've run one buildworld in s aimilar environment so far today, using NFS
to the host for the sources. I'll try another.
Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201610200532.u9K5WHH8018605>