Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2016 10:51:11 -0500 From: Mark Linimon <linimon@lonesome.com> To: "Mikhail T." <mi+thun@aldan.algebra.com> Cc: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: misc/jive deleted Message-ID: <20161024155111.GB15256@lonesome.com> In-Reply-To: <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com> References: <20161022024510.7cvnhc2fdh7h7arh@ozzmosis.com> <20161022092738.GA5690@lonesome.com> <14ff8102-d360-507e-a03b-2ed07b4a5823@aldan.algebra.com> <20161023160352.GX51420@home.opsec.eu> <8a01de23-0e4a-b7d9-cd3b-d6e1e4f44c3f@aldan.algebra.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sun, Oct 23, 2016 at 03:56:07PM -0400, Mikhail T. wrote: > Technically, the only reason to remove a port is due to a failure to > build -- and that hasn't happened. Or: - expired, replaced by newer version - unfetchable - license does not allow anyone to package it - author requested(*) removal I have personally removed ports fitting each of these criteria at various times. I am sure I am missing some other criterion as well. So, your claim is simply false. mcl (*) ok, in one case, it was actually a demand, with the threat of legal action appended.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20161024155111.GB15256>