Date: Wed, 25 Jan 2017 08:55:00 +0100 From: Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu> Cc: ticso@cicely.de, freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Bernd Walter <ticso@cicely7.cicely.de> Subject: Re: 11.0-RC1 unsupported by ports? Message-ID: <20170125075459.GL85666@cicely7.cicely.de> In-Reply-To: <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu> References: <20170125042413.GK85666@cicely7.cicely.de> <20170125062045.GS13006@home.opsec.eu>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
On Wed, Jan 25, 2017 at 07:20:45AM +0100, Kurt Jaeger wrote:
> Hi!
>
> > [61]cnc# make install
> > /!\ ERROR: /!\
> >
> > Ports Collection support for your FreeBSD version has ended, and no ports are
> > guaranteed to build on this system. Please upgrade to a supported release.
> >
> > No support will be provided if you silence this message by defining
> > ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_SYSTEM.
>
> 11.0-RC1 was superseded by 11.0-REL, so while that message is a bit
> drastic, there's a point to it.
With that argument only the latest version would be supported.
That said, it is a release candidate and as such one could argue that
there never had been any official support at all.
In that case however the message is wrong, because when a support has
ended it implies that there was support.
The check in the code is this one:
.if (${OPSYS} == FreeBSD && (${OSVERSION} < 1003000 || (${OSVERSION} >= 1100000 && ${OSVERSION} < 1100122))) || \
(${OPSYS} == DragonFly && ${DFLYVERSION} < 400400)
It is not about RC as such, it is explicitly about 11.0-RC.
My OSVERSION is 1100121.
So obviously support starts with the first release.
Fair enough, but then the message is still wrong unless it was supported.
--
B.Walter <bernd@bwct.de> http://www.bwct.de
Modbus/TCP Ethernet I/O Baugruppen, ARM basierte FreeBSD Rechner uvm.
help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170125075459.GL85666>