Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 20 Feb 2018 12:39:53 +0100
From:      Gary Jennejohn <gljennjohn@gmail.com>
To:        "Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com>
Cc:        "FreeBSD Current" <freebsd-current@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: kernel: failed: cg 5, cgp: 0xd11ecd0d != bp: 0x63d3ff1d
Message-ID:  <20180220123953.5e987691@ernst.home>
In-Reply-To: <f7ffa21203887e43e2acd399cf93871d@udns.ultimatedns.net>
References:  <f7ffa21203887e43e2acd399cf93871d@udns.ultimatedns.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018 14:18:15 -0800
"Chris H" <bsd-lists@BSDforge.com> wrote:

> I'm seeing a number of messages like the following:
> kernel: failed: cg 5, cgp: 0xd11ecd0d != bp: 0x63d3ff1d
> 
> and was wondering if it's anything to be concerned with, or whether
> fsck(8) is fixing them.
> This began to happen when the power went out on a new install:
> FreeBSD dns0 12.0-CURRENT FreeBSD 12.0-CURRENT #0: Wed Dec 13 06:07:59 PST 2017
> root@dns0:/usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/sys/DNS0 amd64
> which hadn't yet been hooked up to the UPS.
> I performed an fsck in single user mode upon power-up. Which ended with the
> mount points being masked CLEAN. I was asked if I wanted to use the JOURNAL.
> I answered Y.
> FWIW the systems are UFS2 (ffs) have gpart labels, and were newfs'd thusly:
> newfs -U -j
> 
> Thank you for all your time, and consideration.
> 

fsck fixes these errors only when the user does NOT use the journal.
You should re-do the fsck.

-- 
Gary Jennejohn



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20180220123953.5e987691>