Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2020 13:38:18 +0700 From: Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Technological advantages over Linux Message-ID: <20200215063818.GE1482@admin.sibptus.ru> In-Reply-To: <20200214204838.360c8f624397c659946bd764@sohara.org> References: <20200214121620.GA80657@admin.sibptus.ru> <CAEJNuHwRs=6kOK9uiFzEAqCgSgvUb8Xm5o2VWnK-ND_zseowdg@mail.gmail.com> <20200214141600.GA82559@admin.sibptus.ru> <20200214204838.360c8f624397c659946bd764@sohara.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--ey/N+yb7u/X9mFhi Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Steve O'Hara-Smith wrote: > On Fri, 14 Feb 2020 21:16:00 +0700 > Victor Sudakov <vas@sibptus.ru> wrote: >=20 > > For example, the absence of Docker (or analogous technology) for FreeBSD > > is a huge disadvantage. We need to name really superiour features to > > make up for this shortage. >=20 > pkg search docker shows a lot of packages including: >=20 > docker-18.09.5_1 Open-source application container engine > docker-compose-1.24.0_1 Define and run multi-container applications > with Docker >=20 > Looks like we have docker=20 I was speaking of sysutils/docker-freebsd which remained BROKEN for years and was eventually removed from the ports tree. I'll certainly look at sysutils/docker and sysutils/docker-compose, thanks for the hint. I hope it is THE docker (/me is starting poudriere...) > - but IMHO jails are better lightweight > containers with a *much* longer track record=20 But jails lack a repository of ready-made containers with applications. To be honest, jails lack even a decent management infrastructure. Yes we have bits like "pkg -j", "bectl jail", "bsdinstall jail", "freebsd-update -b" but nobody cared to build a convenient infrastructure out of all this, not to speak about a repository of ready-made jails for different purposes. > and there's bhyve for full > blown virtualisation. bhyve is great, that's true. If it could also run Windows guests on paravirtualized disks (not emulated SATA), I'd be completely happy. --=20 Victor Sudakov, VAS4-RIPE, VAS47-RIPN 2:5005/49@fidonet http://vas.tomsk.ru/ --ey/N+yb7u/X9mFhi Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJeR5HaAAoJEA2k8lmbXsY0/wYH/AvLbzR76bgNoa8Lm1/yMkdz mq9KdE70Uj5NURCcLO5ANKuExWBPvK0Ali6HulRU1W7iR6sYxcBTTZWQD8ieX6ch r7t6w34wNNfsK0tXcAm3yXNqr8Z52UMUPgZuFxgDgckBn0e6gUWYrxVA8vTlILTa dzV8/7gHogpebuHqXf0ifeF8lZd0vXTVlvh0ysUOZjFcOrmxZoZc8Hllt9pOLlOF RqxRjvJDs3djboSWfVyFPZjIRDbqseprXRtKT+EoQ5DhTqUArXFIH23sKYmKHnh5 KPZaRDVN9IMYGhnM69qoKArgSNpOzObZlIVZ6Pur5JNj6VLbbw8xJGq3xKsRjw4= =Qr1X -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --ey/N+yb7u/X9mFhi--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200215063818.GE1482>