Date: Sat, 11 Jul 2020 11:36:59 +0200 From: Ulrich =?utf-8?B?U3DDtnJsZWlu?= <uqs@freebsd.org> To: Rene Ladan <rene@freebsd.org> Cc: git@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ports 2020Q3 branch not present? Message-ID: <20200711093659.GA16439@acme.spoerlein.net> In-Reply-To: <20200710212416.GA89164@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <20200710212416.GA89164@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 2020-07-10 at 21:24:16 +0000, Rene Ladan wrote: > Hello, > > I noticed that ports 2020Q3 branched is not present in the git ports tree > at cgit-beta.freebsd.org > > It was branched from subversion HEAD as r541028 on 2020-07-02 12:04:18 UTC > The other quarterly branches all seem to be present. Indeed, thanks for the report! I changed the location the branches are being pushed to and messed this up, actually. Now, the big question is whether we want these branches under refs/heads so that everyone will pull them by default (rather wasteful?) or whether we stick them someplace else, so people checking them out will need to add a custom "fetch" line (like we do this for vendor branches over in src). Thoughts? I'm strongly favoring the latter. Cheers Uli
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20200711093659.GA16439>