Date: Fri, 23 Sep 2016 16:26:19 +0300 From: Alexander Moisseev <moiseev@mezonplus.ru> To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Differences when using `make` V `port test` Message-ID: <2177a1e7-fa9f-4707-5a6b-7b0bd01b02af@mezonplus.ru> In-Reply-To: <3ef6ea87-0a2c-e87e-66e2-535c11d01ed1@FreeBSD.org> References: <CAGKJJVnDPx5YXQxMdjkbKSjeTETsBfsMtd-0Nnem58=F0x_1Pw@mail.gmail.com> <3ef6ea87-0a2c-e87e-66e2-535c11d01ed1@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 23.09.2016 15:45, Mathieu Arnold wrote: > > I don't really know what it does, but to test a port, it seems > overcomplicated, everything is already done by the framework. > > Best would be for you to put: > > DEVELOPER=yes > > in /etc/make.conf > > and simply run "make" as a regular user, it will check everything that > can be. > I believe the most important difference is "port test" does real install (into a temp dir) and deinstall, "make" doesn't (merely staging).
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2177a1e7-fa9f-4707-5a6b-7b0bd01b02af>