Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2000 00:52:22 -0800 From: Jordan Hubbard <jkh@winston.osd.bsdi.com> To: Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org> Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/lib/libc_r Makefile src/lib/libc_r/uthread pthread_private.h uthread_attr_setschedparam.c uthread_cond.c uthread_create.c uthread_detach.c uthread_execve.c uthread_exit.c uthread_fd.c uthread_file.c uthread_fork.c uthread_gc.c ... Message-ID: <22907.973846342@winston.osd.bsdi.com> In-Reply-To: Message from Daniel Eischen <deischen@FreeBSD.org> of "Thu, 09 Nov 2000 15:46:07 PST." <200011092346.PAA18362@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> MFC: bring in signal handling changes, bug fixes, performance > enhancements, and other good stuff. gdb thread changes to > follow later tonight. > > Approved by: jkh And just to answer the (as yet) unasked question: I allowed this in because even though it was a large change, it was a change occurring in an area largely off the critical path. Those people who do care about functional threads do care rather deeply, however, so the trade-off was deemed to have an acceptable risk/reward ratio. - Jordan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?22907.973846342>