Date: Mon, 30 Jun 1997 20:32:41 -0700 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> To: Robert Withrow <witr@rwwa.com> Cc: Chuck Robey <chuckr@glue.umd.edu>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: NFS V3 is it stable? Message-ID: <24401.867727961@time.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Mon, 30 Jun 1997 22:05:49 EDT." <199707010205.WAA28727@spooky.rwwa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> But... I am doing this without *any* problems with FBSD 2.1.[567], where the > mail spools are served by a Solaris system. I was going to upgrade > a bunch of systems to 2.2-release, but now I'm worried. IMO, This *must* > be made to work at least as well as it does in 2.1.[567]. It never worked at all, not in 2.1.[67] or now, so your degree of risk is essentially the same. We've been waiting forever for someone to take an active enough interest in this to implement an NFS locking daemon. We're still waiting. ;) Jordan P.S. Terry sent me the skeleton of something way back when I was actually masochistically considering this myself, but I came to my senses and backed away in time. :)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?24401.867727961>