Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:29:31 +0800 From: "Mars G. Miro" <marsgmiro@gmail.com> To: daichi@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: patchset-9 release (Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010) Message-ID: <28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Daichi-san, >I have updated the patchset-9 of unionfs. > We've been using an in-house LiveCD toolkit that uses unionfs (where cd9660 is the lower layer) and all I can say is that these patches are very important, at least on =3D> 6.X, otherwise things would just not work. I believe the FreeSBIE folks also went thru the same experience as they also do this (cd9960 lower, unionfs upper). I have tried your p8-patchset diffs for about 2 weeks now and It Works (TM). Will try your p9 diffs soon ;-) Will these diffs remain to be diffs or do people think that these will be integrated into the sources sometime? Thanks! >Patchset-9: > For 7-current > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p9.diff > > For 6.x > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p9.diff > > Changes in unionfs-p9.diff > - Now you can use unionfs with nullfs. To fix the problem, > We fixed the rock-treatment of src/sys/fs/nullfs/null_vnops.c > >The documents of those unionfs patches: > > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/ (English) > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/index-ja.html (Japanese) > >The patchset-9 is important step for merging to FreeBSD 7-current. >You can use improved unionfs and nullfs together. This is a goot step >for all of us. > >Thanks > >-- > Daichi GOTO, http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi cheers mars
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?28edec3c0603151829r7ff125f8m3dfb8c194d0731b7>