Date: Fri, 26 Oct 2001 18:20:33 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: tlambert2@mindspring.com Cc: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Peter Wemm <peter@wemm.org>, arch@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: 64 bit times revisited.. Message-ID: <2912.1004113233@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 26 Oct 2001 09:12:26 PDT." <3BD98B6A.DED6D38F@mindspring.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <3BD98B6A.DED6D38F@mindspring.com>, Terry Lambert writes: >Poul-Henning Kamp wrote: >> Your proposal would leave us with quarter-microsecond resolution, >> and I'm pretty sure I can beat that to pulp in the next 10 years >> on a RAM disk... >> >> There is no harm in having to run a rev on the UFS/FFS on-disk format, >> when you hav 37 years to complete it. > >Or 10 years, if we go Julian's way. Julians way doesn't work: it has insufficient sub-second resolution. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-arch" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2912.1004113233>