Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2012 08:02:33 -0600 From: Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com> To: Rainer Hurling <rhurlin@gwdg.de> Cc: David Schultz <das@FreeBSD.ORG>, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, Peter Jeremy <peter@rulingia.com>, Steve Kargl <sgk@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> Subject: Re: Use of C99 extra long double math functions after r236148 Message-ID: <2A1DE516-ABB4-49D7-8C3D-2C4DA2D9FCF5@bsdimp.com> In-Reply-To: <4FFBF16D.2030007@gwdg.de> References: <4FC3EBDA.2080502@missouri.edu> <20120528221731.GA76723@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FC40449.3040602@missouri.edu> <20120528233035.GA77157@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FC40DEA.8030703@missouri.edu> <20120529000756.GA77386@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FC43C8F.5090509@missouri.edu> <20120529045612.GB4445@server.rulingia.com> <20120708124047.GA44061@zim.MIT.EDU> <210816F0-7ED7-4481-ABFF-C94A700A3EA0@bsdimp.com> <20120708233624.GA53462@troutmask.apl.washington.edu> <4FFBF16D.2030007@gwdg.de>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Jul 10, 2012, at 3:10 AM, Rainer Hurling wrote: > As far as I understand from discussions on R mailing list = (r-devel@r-project.org), they plan to reduce the emulation and/or = workaround of long and complex math functions for FreeBSD and other = systems with their next releases of R devel. So we could really need = some progress with our C99 conform math functions ;-) Not having R would be a bit pain in my backside. That's one of the = practical considerations that I was talking about. It is very real, and = if I have to, I'll commit the #define junk I railed against to get it = back. Please, let's get some progress. I have some time to help. Warner
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2A1DE516-ABB4-49D7-8C3D-2C4DA2D9FCF5>