Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2005 11:46:40 -0800 From: ray@redshift.com To: Nathan Vidican <nvidican@wmptl.com> Cc: ogreve@millennics.com, amd64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.4 or 6 for DB server with 9500S-4 ? Message-ID: <3.0.1.32.20051125114640.00a5d2f8@pop.redshift.com> In-Reply-To: <43871B20.3050007@wmptl.com> References: <3.0.1.32.20051125041044.00a47720@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051121055411.00aa1490@pop.redshift.com> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <20051119120051.39BE216A41F@hub.freebsd.org> <20051119200222.V2029@roble.com> <3.0.1.32.20051121055411.00aa1490@pop.redshift.com> <3.0.1.32.20051125041044.00a47720@pop.redshift.com>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
| I disagree. First-off, 6.0-RELEASE may be new to the block, but 6.0 has been | kicking it almost as long as 5.4-RELEASE has been out. Most of the experiences | I've heard back from other users are saying 6.0, even RC-1 before -RELEASE | actually runs better than 5.4-RELEASE. Certain key optimizations in 6.0 will Speaking of First-off: That original message was a private message to me and you from Olaf asking for our opinions on FreeBSD, etc. and it was replied to as such (privately) - in my opinion it's very poor form to suddenly cc everything we are discussing off the list back to the FreeBSD without so much as asking. If you want to start a thread about is FreeBSD 5.4 or 6.0 better for production, that's great. But don't use my private messages to people seeking help to do it. Rayhome | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.1.32.20051125114640.00a5d2f8>