Date: Fri, 19 Nov 1999 10:13:03 -0500 From: Tom Embt <tom@embt.com> To: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: Microsoft service packs... (was many other threads...) Message-ID: <3.0.3.32.19991119101303.01216df8@mail.embt.com> In-Reply-To: <000001bf3264$9ac28160$021d85d1@youwant.to> References: <3834DDDF.DCA2119A@dogma.freebsd-uk.eu.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Perhaps one cannot mention NT without feeling an intense need to vent frustration. As for Win2K, I crash it constantly, but I think it's mostly a "video driver thing". Tom Embt > > I'm baffled. How did the merits of NT get into this? We were never even >discussing whether NT was a good or bad server operating system. > > DS > >> Quote from a friend who is an NT admin... >> In response to David's comments on NT 'advances' in Service Packs.... >> >> >> This is nuts. >> >> >> Anyway, I think NT is stable when it comes to programs, but when the >> system goes down, it goes down hard. The other day, I installed a new >> server, which had nothing on it but NT4.0 and service pack 4. The >> company >> came out to install the banks software, and it crashed (bug checked) >> TWICE >> just during the FILE COPY!!! I mean, come on. How the heck can you >> norrow >> down what caused that? >> >> No, the more I use NT, the more I hate it. Even from the very limited >> use >> of win2000, I think it will be much better. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.3.32.19991119101303.01216df8>