Date: Tue, 04 Apr 2000 16:26:56 +0400 From: Sergei Vyshenski <svysh@pn.sinp.msu.ru> To: Mike Tancsa <mike@sentex.net> Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: ata sad combinatorics Message-ID: <3.0.5.32.20000404162656.007c5600@vivaldi> In-Reply-To: <4.2.2.20000404074518.032c5568@mail.sentex.net> References: <3.0.5.32.20000404150052.007c4710@vivaldi>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>It would make a fairly significant difference, if you actually posted some >details about the hardware. Saying, "586" is kind of useless. Post the >output of dmesg, and uname -a and sysctl hw.atamodes. > > ---Mike > Please find info from box (A) with disks (2) and (3) as ad0 and ad2. Initial message please find below. ****dmesg:**** Copyright (c) 1992-2000 The FreeBSD Project. Copyright (c) 1982, 1986, 1989, 1991, 1993 The Regents of the University of California. All rights reserved. FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 29 14:26:29 MSD 2000 Timecounter "i8254" frequency 1193182 Hz Timecounter "TSC" frequency 99474317 Hz CPU: Pentium/P54C (99.47-MHz 586-class CPU) Origin = "GenuineIntel" Id = 0x525 Stepping = 5 Features=0x1bf<FPU,VME,DE,PSE,TSC,MSR,MCE,CX8> real memory = 41943040 (40960K bytes) avail memory = 38416384 (37516K bytes) Preloaded elf kernel "SCARLATTI" at 0xc027b000. Intel Pentium detected, installing workaround for F00F bug npx0: <math processor> on motherboard npx0: INT 16 interface pcib0: <Host to PCI bridge> on motherboard pci0: <PCI bus> on pcib0 isab0: <Intel 82371FB PCI to ISA bridge> at device 7.0 on pci0 isa0: <ISA bus> on isab0 atapci0: <Intel PIIX ATA controller> port 0xffa0-0xffaf at device 7.1 on pci0 ata0: at 0x1f0 irq 14 on atapci0 ata1: at 0x170 irq 15 on atapci0 ed0: <NE2000 PCI Ethernet (RealTek 8029)> port 0xef80-0xef9f irq 11 at device 20.0 on pci0 ed0: supplying EUI64: 00:40:95:ff:fe:42:e3:9d ed0: address 00:40:95:42:e3:9d, type NE2000 (16 bit) fdc0: <NEC 765 or clone> at port 0x3f0-0x3f5,0x3f7 irq 6 drq 2 on isa0 fd0: <1440-KB 3.5" drive> on fdc0 drive 0 atkbdc0: <keyboard controller (i8042)> at port 0x60-0x6f on isa0 atkbd0: <AT Keyboard> irq 1 on atkbdc0 vga0: <Generic ISA VGA> at port 0x3c0-0x3df iomem 0xa0000-0xbffff on isa0 sc0: <System console> on isa0 sc0: VGA <16 virtual consoles, flags=0x200> sio0 at port 0x3f8-0x3ff irq 4 flags 0x10 on isa0 sio0: type 16550A sio1 at port 0x2f8-0x2ff irq 3 on isa0 sio1: type 16550A sio2: configured irq 5 not in bitmap of probed irqs 0 ppc0: <Parallel port> at port 0x378-0x37f irq 7 on isa0 ppc0: Generic chipset (EPP/NIBBLE) in COMPATIBLE mode ppi0: <Parallel I/O> on ppbus0 lpt0: <Printer> on ppbus0 lpt0: Interrupt-driven port IP packet filtering initialized, divert disabled, rule-based forwarding disabled, default to deny, logging limited to 200 packets/entry by default ad0: 3815MB <WDC AC34000L> [7752/16/63] at ata0-master using WDMA2 ad2: 4172MB <FUJITSU MPA3043AT> [9042/15/63] at ata1-master using WDMA2 Mounting root from ufs:/dev/ad0s2a ed0: starting DAD for fe80:0001::0240:95ff:fe42:e39d ed0: DAD complete for fe80:0001::0240:95ff:fe42:e39d - no duplicates found ***uname -a: *** FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE FreeBSD 4.0-STABLE #0: Wed Mar 29 14:26:29 MSD 2000 ***sysctl hw.atamodes: *** hw.atamodes: dma,---,dma,---, ============================================================ initial message follows ============================================================ Fresh (and identical) 4.0-stable systems with support for ata0 and ata1 were tried at: (A) Intel-586 box (B) Intel-686 box Tested were 3 large IDE disks: (1) - fully occupied by FreeBSD (2) and (3) - first half occupied by Win98, second by FreeBSD **Box (A): Ok with any disk as ad0. Ok with any disk as ad0 and any other as ad1. (2) as first master and (3) as second master are ok when booted under Win98. Any disk as ad0 and any other as ad2 under FreeBSD: as soon as I try to mount something from the ad2, I see continuos chain of complains: ad2: READ command timeout -resetting ata1: resetting devices done ata1-master: WARNING: WAIT_READY active=ATA_ACTIVE_ATA ... **Box (B): Ok with any combination of disks. If bios of (A) should be considered too old, then why Win98 gives more successful combinations, than FreeBSD? Note that second large master IS understood by Win98, but is NOT understood by FreeBSD (even if it has only ufs partitions). To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-stable" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3.0.5.32.20000404162656.007c5600>