Date: Thu, 22 Aug 1996 14:15:14 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: sos@freebsd.org Cc: "Rodney W. Grimes" <rgrimes@gndrsh.aac.dev.com>, pst@jnx.com, current@freebsd.org, archie@whistle.com Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/netinet in.h ip_fw.h ip_input.c ip_output.c Message-ID: <321CCDE2.794BDF32@whistle.com> References: <199608222037.WAA28271@DeepCore.dk>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
sos@freebsd.org wrote: > > In reply to Rodney W. Grimes who wrote: > > context switches are just not going to cut it... though sometimes you need to do things with packets that require interaction with a database of reading from files etc.. I put it to you that having a general way of getting the packets out of the kernel is better than adding bloat IN the kernel to do these things. > > Exactly, but I share Garrets concerns on the mess we have in the IP > code by now (Se the new thread "How do we cleanup the IP code mess" > I've started for a possible solution). Certainly I had misgivings about adding stuff to the IP processing path so I am certainly happy to see if we can clean it up.. I like the idea personally of a pointer that is jumped to, that normally results in normal processing, but which can be replaced and 'chained' as soeren suggests.help
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?321CCDE2.794BDF32>