Date: Tue, 08 Oct 1996 14:49:41 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@whistle.com> To: Stefan Bethke <stefan@pong.ppp.de> Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Netatalk.. anyone tried the new release? Message-ID: <325ACC75.446B9B3D@whistle.com> References: <v03007800ae7faa8199df@[193.141.161.123]>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Stefan Bethke wrote:
>
> At 19:13 Uhr -0700 07.10.1996, Julian Elischer wrote:
> >Does anyone hae any success/failure stories with teh new release?
> >it seems to work here, but I'd like to here from anyone who has
> >tried it with positive or negative feedback....
>
> Somewhat off, but whatever: in comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc, you said some
> days ago, it would be easy to back-port the AppleTalk kernel parts to
> 2.1.5-R. I tried (patching net/{if_ethersubr.c,if_loop.c,netisr.c} and
> copying netatalk from -current).
>
> netatalk-1.3.3 compiles, but atalkd isn't able to run (haven't looked
> further why). netatalk 1.4b1 doesn't compile on 2.1.5-R (errors in
> compiling afpd, something with getquota()).
(just comment out all the quota stuff :)
the patch in control.c in atalkd in 1.4 was based on the sam epatch on
1.3.3
and allowed atalkd to run by default..
it does run
if you supply a conf file, even without the patch
as that code isn't run in that case.
>
> I'll try again when I'm finally delving into -current.
>
I recommend current anyhow....
> --
> Stefan Bethke <stefan@pong.ppp.de>
> Hamburg, Germany
I assume you have the FreeBSD patches for 1.3.3?
the kernel code we have came from the 2.1 port of 1.3.3
I ported it to 2.2 and checked it in..
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?325ACC75.446B9B3D>