Date: Sun, 28 Feb 1999 23:32:37 -0800 From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@zippy.cdrom.com> To: obrien@NUXI.com Cc: current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gcc Message-ID: <32636.920273557@zippy.cdrom.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 28 Feb 1999 22:57:39 PST." <19990228225739.F3380@relay.nuxi.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Thus libg++ classes are a purely FSF class library that shouldn't be used > for any new code development. The current libg++ only contains what was > left after the ISO stdlibc++ stuff was gutted. Thanks for the explanation - that makes things much clearer. So, I guess we shoot for libstdc++ as the "minimum requirements" and perhaps provide libg++ as well (not necessarily initially) just for the convenience of those porting code from environments where the GNU library functions were used. I've just built the world and kernel from egcs-2.91.62 and it seems to work pretty well. I haven't really stress the system all that much yet, but it hasn't misbehaved in any way yet. - Jrodan To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?32636.920273557>