Date: Tue, 30 Apr 1996 10:20:05 +0000 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.tfs.com> To: Paul Richards <p.richards@elsevier.co.uk> Cc: wosch@cs.tu-berlin.de, bde@zeta.org.au, jkh@time.cdrom.com, current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Files installed to /etc, (was: review request) Message-ID: <3285.830859605@critter.tfs.com> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 30 Apr 1996 11:10:11 %2B0100." <199604301010.LAA17456@cadair.elsevier.co.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > > /usr/share/etc > > > > That would be obviously wrong. It is >not< shareable, now even inside > > the same architecture. > > Why isn't it? Until it's edited and installed in /etc it should be just > a template that would be host independant and entirely shareable? Yes, host independent, but not architecture independent... /etc/rc for instance has to be architecture dependent to initialize weird HW... -- Poul-Henning Kamp | phk@FreeBSD.ORG FreeBSD Core-team. http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk Private mailbox. whois: [PHK] | phk@ref.tfs.com TRW Financial Systems, Inc. Future will arrive by its own means, progress not so.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3285.830859605>