Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:33:39 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: Kirk McKusick <mckusick@mckusick.com> Cc: Robert Watson <rwatson@FreeBSD.ORG>, Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org>, Rik van Riel <riel@conectiva.com.br>, freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG, Matt Dillon <dillon@earth.backplane.com>, David Xu <bsddiy@21cn.com> Subject: Re: vm balance Message-ID: <33029.987575619@critter> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:40:21 PDT." <200104180540.WAA58303@beastie.mckusick.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <200104180540.WAA58303@beastie.mckusick.com>, Kirk McKusick writes: >Every vnode in the system has an associated object. No: device vnodes dont... I think the correct solution to that is to move devices away from vnodes and into the fdesc layer, just like fifo's and sockets. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33029.987575619>