Date: Tue, 01 Apr 1997 12:39:17 -0500 From: Wilson MacGyver <macgyver@db-net.com> To: hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: p166 vs. p166mmx Message-ID: <33414845.51AD@db-net.com> References: <199704011347.QAA20476@shadows.aeon.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mika ruohotie wrote: > first normal intel pentium 166mhz: > -- > make -k world 7595.59s user 1843.94s system 87% cpu 3:00:48.28 total > > make depend 25.66s user 9.29s system 79% cpu 44.132 total > text data bss dec hex > 798720 53248 95220 947188 e73f4 > make 237.70s user 27.34s system 84% cpu 5:12.39 total > 960912 Apr 1 11:55 > -- > > then, the intel pentium 166mhz with mmx > -- > make -k world 5982.25s user 1636.02s system 87% cpu 2:24:21.88 total > > make depend 21.54s user 8.26s system 78% cpu 37.911 total > text data bss dec hex > 798720 53248 95220 947188 e73f4 > make 188.30s user 25.57s system 89% cpu 3:58.24 total > 960912 Apr 1 15:31 Wouldn't this be because of the larger L1 cache? If memory serves, L1 cache was increased from 16K to 32K... -- Wilson MacGyver macgyver@db-net.com -------------------------------------- Veni, Vidi, Concidi.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33414845.51AD>