Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 13:32:17 -0700 From: Don Wilde <Don@PartsNow.com> To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com> Cc: stable@freebsd.org Subject: stable gotta be stable! Message-ID: <33592BD1.7F0F@PartsNow.com>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I have 4 on-line machines which are running 2.1.7. I am hesitant to use 2.2.1 until I know both the X and 2940 problems are put to bed. I do not intend to use the CDROM.COM servers to update via internet as I have a lot of machines to update (besides the live machines)and I don't have spare bandwidth or the time to babysit full upgrades. I have been using the CD's as my -stable. I **DO** need to be able to view them as stable, as my company depends on its webservers and firewall for its very business. I can't play with immature code. At home I can play, but here I can't. If you must drop something, rearrange the CD's so that both the 2.1-stable and the 2.2-mostlystable OS code and the major packages is on the 2 CD's which are constantly updated, and reduce the frequency of the PORTS CD releases for some of the less-needed stuff like CAD and GAMES. You guys should be thrilled that your code is good enough to be used for corporate work, and it really is that good. ;-))) Thanks for asking for comment, Jordan. There's just these perverted little rats and their robots out there on the 'net, you know... -- oooOOO O O O o * * * * * * o ___ _________ _________ ________ _________ _________ ___==_ V_=_=_DW ===--- Don Wilde [don@PartsNow.com] [http://www.PartsNow.com ] /oo0000oo-oo--oo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo--ooo-ooo---ooo-ooo---ooo-oo--oo
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?33592BD1.7F0F>