Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2016 20:32:00 +0200 From: =?utf-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=C3=BCsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> To: scratch65535@att.net Cc: freebsd-ports <ports@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Jive prejudices Message-ID: <348280F2-DA1F-491B-ABF7-66C8A9766AC8@waschbuesch.de> In-Reply-To: <acup0clb6r1j3ekl8hg510llbmmpive1eo@4ax.com> References: <20161022181202.F36710-100000@main.put.com> <201610231341.u9NDfKpp008090@alpd679.prodigy.net> <acup0clb6r1j3ekl8hg510llbmmpive1eo@4ax.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Am 23.10.2016 um 20:00 schrieb scratch65535@att.net: >=20 > For policy, I'd suggest the creation of a flag "Socially > deprecated" that would leave it in the tree but clue people up > that there's potentially something unsavory about it. As others have already said, it is unlikely that we could come up with a = definition of 'unsavory' that is universally accepted. Also, I doubt that anything technical we could come up with could = adequately address this issue as it is not technical in nature. I propose that no classification whatsoever be implemented. If at all necessary, we could have a disclaimer stating that it is no = endorsement of any kind whatsoever if a piece of software is in the = ports tree. Martin=
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?348280F2-DA1F-491B-ABF7-66C8A9766AC8>