Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2015 10:33:38 +0100 From: Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Roger_Pau_Monn=C3=A9?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>, Adam McDougall <mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu>, freebsd-xen@freebsd.org Subject: Re: XenServer 6.5(SP1) - HVM 're0: watchdog timeout' errors... Message-ID: <34C596D4CD79963C95725C41@[10.12.30.106]> In-Reply-To: <55EFF61A.3020409@citrix.com> References: <9CC4073DE17E3C8BD01EF7D3@[10.12.30.106]> <55EDA470.1000007@citrix.com> <C1F8BAECAFA8EB8C9A97D5FA@[10.12.30.106]> <55EDC55B.8000004@egr.msu.edu> <762F895FF087C3BBB6DB94DA@[10.12.30.106]> <BBDE686A05E03437BB32667C@[10.12.30.106]> <55EFF61A.3020409@citrix.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--On 09 September 2015 11:04 +0200 Roger Pau Monn=C3=A9 = <roger.pau@citrix.com>=20 wrote: > I'm working on importing a new netfront from Linux, which hopefully > should solve the problems we are having with the PV nic. That'll be great - I did test a CentOS box domU a while ago, and that=20 didn't have the problem with routing traffic, I wasn't able to test things=20 like OpenVPN/DCHP on it - but the current netfront issues are annoying=20 [there's at least 2 FreeBSD PR's I know of this would also address]. > In the meantime, I have the following crappy patch to FreeBSD if_re > driver, which should disable the watchdog (I have not even compile > tested this). Thanks - I'll give that a go... I also discovered that the 'virtio'=20 virtual NIC's - *do* migrate OK, I'm just setting up a test platform using=20 those to see if they have the same netfront issues as PV xn interfaces=20 (i.e. can't route / openvpn fails). I'll post back with the results of that + the patch when I have them, Thanks, -Kp
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34C596D4CD79963C95725C41>