Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 17 Feb 1998 14:44:52 -0700
From:      Sean Kelly <kelly@plutotech.com>
To:        Nate Williams <nate@mt.sri.com>
Cc:        Adam Capell <acapell@value.net>, java@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Sunsoft swing classes
Message-ID:  <34EA04D4.5608730A@plutotech.com>
References:  <34E9EBD7.3DDB6BE8@value.net> <34E9EEFE.D24DAA09@plutotech.com> <199802172134.OAA29842@mt.sri.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nate Williams wrote:

> > Swing applications look the same from platform to
> > platform.
>
> That is no longer the case.  They have a different look and feel now
> depending on the platform, which is IMHO a step in the wrong direction.
> But, it's apparently necessary to skirt legal/licensing issues.

I'll say.

Do they achieve this by using the native widgets or by drawing things
differently depending on the platform?

Damn lawyers.  They really know how to screw up good software.

--Sean


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-java" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34EA04D4.5608730A>