Date: Sun, 15 Feb 1998 06:18:06 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: John Goerzen <jgoerzen@alexanderwohl.complete.org> Cc: Konrad Heuer <kheuer@gwdu60.gwdg.de>, Vincent Defert <vdefert@trace.fr>, freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: FreeBSD vs Linux Message-ID: <34e88842.7309199@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980214223310.224B-100000@alexanderwohl> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.980214223310.224B-100000@alexanderwohl>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Sat, 14 Feb 1998 22:38:12 -0600 (CST), John Goerzen <jgoerzen@alexanderwohl.complete.org> wrote: >On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Konrad Heuer wrote: > >> 1. The Linux scheduler which is very different from other UNIX >> schedulers (and thus the FreeBSD scheduler) behaves very poor when the >> system is heavily loaded (no fair scheduling!). > >In comparing Linux to SunOS and Solaris in heavliy-loaded systems, I can >say that Linux performed much better. However, I have not compared it >directly to FreeBSD. I have. Linux comes apart at the seams under load. FreeBSD just keeps going and going and going .... -- The day of the proprietary OS is over. Long live free software. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?34e88842.7309199>