Date: Mon, 04 May 1998 03:29:34 GMT From: jak@cetlink.net (John Kelly) To: Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no> Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports/www/ijb - Imported sources Message-ID: <355034a1.230009870@mail.cetlink.net> In-Reply-To: <19980504051020.57951@follo.net> References: <19980503230438.48318@follo.net> <Pine.BSF.3.96.980503205621.20104E-100000@sasami.jurai.net> <19980504032939.07389@follo.net> <354d2457.225839725@mail.cetlink.net> <19980504042649.61453@follo.net> <354e28ff.227031838@mail.cetlink.net> <19980504044244.39282@follo.net> <354f2cb0.227976964@mail.cetlink.net> <19980504051020.57951@follo.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 4 May 1998 05:10:20 +0200, Eivind Eklund <eivind@yes.no>
wrote:
>> It's self evident to most people that they have the right to determine
>> who and what enter their home.
>
>That's not privacy. Here's a definition:
>From WordNet (r) 1.6 [wn]:
>
> privacy
> n 1: the quality of being secluded from the presence or view of
> others [syn: {privateness}, {seclusion}]
> 2: the condition of being concealed or hidden [syn: {privateness},
> {secrecy}, {concealment}]
>
You ought to get your head out of your computer and read a book once
in a while. Try Webster's:
privacy
1b: freedom from unauthorized intrusion <one's right to ~>
>I had a a suspicion that what you were really attempting to say was
>something like the above, which is why I re-phrased that and included it in
>my reply (the one you re-replied to with "It's self evident", seemingly not
>having grasped any of my comments :-(
They had so little substance, there was nothing to grasp.
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?355034a1.230009870>