Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 15 Jun 1998 22:36:45 -0600
From:      Wes Peters <wes@softweyr.com>
To:        love@cptech.org
Cc:        advocacy@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Draft of letter to DOJ
Message-ID:  <3585F65D.CA47C812@softweyr.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mr. Love,

This evening I read your draft letter to Mr. Klein et al with great
interest.  This is a topic I have some interest in, as I have been
a user and occasional contributor to the FreeBSD project since its
early days.  I am also a user of and developer of software for the
BeOS.

Please allow me to express my thanks for your carefully reasoned
letter.  I have a few small suggestions which I believe will help
to clarify your letter somewhat; please feel free to contact me
if I can be of assistance in any way.

Your mention of BeOS in Section III is well placed.  I fear, however,
the mention of only one commercial alternative to Windows may not
impress the target audience at first blush.  While BeOS is a marvel,
it does not yet have a large, established user base, though many
software developers such as myself are working to establish one.  It
may be beneficial to your argument to mention other commercially
successful operating systems such as BSDi, Solaris x86, and UnixWare.

In Section IV, your mention of both Linux and FreeBSD covers the
largest installed base of users of "free" operating systems.  As I
am sure you are aware, other alternatives including NetBSD and OpenBSD 
also exist.

The characterization of FreeBSD as "a non-copyleft Unix system that is 
in the public domain" is somewhat inaccurate.  FreeBSD is copyrighted;
the copyright allows the user to use FreeBSD in any way so long as
credit is given to the creators of the code.  It would please me, and 
others in the FreeBSD community, to see a more accurate representation 
of the FreeBSD license given.

I also feel strongly that mention of the free availability of source 
code to BIND, the server that implements the Domain Name System, would 
enhance your argument.  Not only is BIND the heart of the DNS, which 
in turn drives the World Wide Web, it is also arguably the worlds 
largest distributed information system, and is maintained primarily on 
the goodwill and cooperation of its users throughout the world.

Again, please allow me to thank you, Mr. Nader, and your organization
for your activities on the behalf of myself and my fellow computer
users throughout the world.  As you say, competition benefits users of
computers everywhere, and ironically, would benefit Microsoft if they
would only shed their cloak of paranoia and begin to compete in the
marketplace.  If I can help in any way to clarify or expand your know-
lege of the free source software market, please contact me at:

	mailto:wes@softweyr.com

I have sent a copy of this letter to the FreeBSD Advocacy mailing list,
as there has been a lively discussion of your draft on this list.  The
general "sense of the list" was thankful that you and Mr. Nader are
taking up this cause, and appreciation for the heightened awareness of
free source products in general and FreeBSD in particular.

-- 
       "Where am I, and what am I doing in this handbasket?"

Wes Peters                                                 Softweyr LLC
http://www.softweyr.com/~softweyr                      wes@softweyr.com

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3585F65D.CA47C812>