Date: Fri, 03 Apr 1998 22:40:17 +0200 From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk@critter.freebsd.dk> To: =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==?= <ache@nagual.pp.ru> Cc: "Alok K. Dhir" <adhir@worldbank.org>, current@FreeBSD.ORG, adkin003@tc.umn.edu Subject: Re: Working patch *with* splhigh() (Was Re: More info RE: X slowdown in -current) Message-ID: <3605.891636017@critter.freebsd.dk> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sat, 04 Apr 1998 00:35:18 %2B0400." <19980404003518.63228@nagual.pp.ru>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message <19980404003518.63228@nagual.pp.ru>, =?koi8-r?B?4c7E0sXKIP7F0s7P1w==
?= writes:
>> if (!timo) printf("proc %d sleeping indefenitely", curproc->p_pid);
>>
>> Netscape should not be amongst them, you'll maybe see inetd and a couple
>> like that...
>
>I got this message frequently for both xterm and Netscape.
Ok, next print out the value of the atv (struct timeval) when that
happens... xterm is probably normal, it wouldn't need to give a timeout.
--
Poul-Henning Kamp FreeBSD coreteam member
phk@FreeBSD.ORG "Real hackers run -current on their laptop."
"Drink MONO-tonic, it goes down but it will NEVER come back up!"
To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3605.891636017>