Date: Tue, 3 Dec 2024 13:36:07 -0500 From: Juan Manuel Palacios <jmpalacios@gmail.com> To: Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> Cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: postgresql 16 Message-ID: <3614A2E8-4BE5-4285-B9B3-6349235D41C2@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <3bc92b40-205f-4da1-ab9c-d3ae5bb5ab1a@netfence.it> References: <6cKxpppDaTNpexhV@aceecat.org> <abc9e458-9305-40b0-bc58-ec1dd3d636dc@fechner.net> <3bc92b40-205f-4da1-ab9c-d3ae5bb5ab1a@netfence.it>
index | next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail
> On Dec 3, 2024, at 2:54 AM, Andrea Venturoli <ml@netfence.it> wrote: > > On 12/3/24 06:55, Matthias Fechner wrote: > >> why not do a: >> pkg upgrade > > Maybe the OP is using 2024Q4 port tree? > PostgreSQL updates are often not MFH (even for security fixes). > > bye > av. > Right, the fresh ports.org age for PostgreSQL 16 clearly shows that the port is still at 16.4 for the quarterly branch, so that could very well be the case. A simple ‘pkg -vv’ invocation would show the active packages repository.home | help
Want to link to this message? Use this
URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3614A2E8-4BE5-4285-B9B3-6349235D41C2>